A Logical Interpretation of Brutality in ISIS “Shocking” Videos: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis

Abdelaziz, Ghada

doi:10.21608/jssa.2022.135167.1379

A Logical Interpretation of Brutality in ISIS “Shocking” Videos: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Ghada Abdelaziz

Ain Shams University

10.21608/jssa.2022.135167.1379

Abstract

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) emerged as an offshoot of al Qaeda in 2014. It quickly took control of large parts of Iraq and Syria. This study analyzes five ISIS most “shocking” videos all released in 2015. Multimodal Analysis nowadays seeks to achieve an inferential process of reasoning about the best interpretation of films. This study uses Janina Wildfeuer’s framework, ‘Logic of Film Discourse Interpretation’ (2014) as well as the Appraisal model of Martin and White (2005) to analyze the data under investigation. This study aims at; showing how a logical approach to film analysis can help attaining better interpretation and form the argumentative structure of the videos; modifying Wildfeuer’s model so that logical relations can be maintained in consecutive as well as non-consecutive shots which proves that ISIS follows a certain pattern in its slaughtering crimes; and showing how ISIS justifies its brutality and threatens its enemies. The analysis reveals that the data under investigation follows certain logical patterns. The study modifies Wildfeuer’s model which proves that ISIS follows a certain pattern in its slaughtering crimes. It also reveals that ISIS, through such videos, aims to send a threatening message to the whole world and to justify its crimes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

العلوم الإنسانية

References

Allendorfer, W. H., & Herring, S. C. (2015). Isis vs. the U.S. government: A war of online video propaganda. First Monday.

Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox Pub.

Bateman, J. A., & Schmidt, K. (2014). Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. New York: Routledge.

Bateman, J. A., Wildfeuer, J., & Hiippala, T. (2017). Multimodality: Foundations, research and analysis a problem-oriented introduction. Boston: De Gruyter/Mouton.

Gales, T. (2011). Identifying interpersonal stance in threatening discourse: An appraisal analysis. Discourse Studies, 13(1), 27-46.

Halliday, M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Education.

Halliday, M. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: Edward Arnold.

Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2010). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kress, G. R., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kress, G. R., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

Kruglanski, A. W., Bin Hassan, A. R., Jasko, G. K., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). ISIS: Its history, ideology, and psychology. In M. R. Woodward & R. A. Lukens-Bull (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary Islam and Muslim lives (pp. 1-45). Cham: Springer Nature.

Lascarides, A., & Asher, N. (2007). Segmented discourse representation theory: Dynamic semantics with discourse structure. In H. C. Bunt & R. Muskens (Eds.), Computing meaning (pp. 87-124). Dordrecht: Springer.

Martin, J. R. (2010). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Coninuum.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martinec, R. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337-371.

Marín Arrese, J. I., & Núñez Perucha, B. (2006). Evaluation and engagement in journalistic commentary and news reportage. Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses, (19), 225.

O'Halloran, K. L. (2006). Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic-Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.

Rasoulikolamaki, S., & Kaur, S. (2021). How ISIS represented enemies as ineffectual in Dabiq: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Communication, 15(6), 650-671.

Taradlafta,, H., & Al Manaseer, J. F. (2019). Multimodal representational meanings of Isis’s victims on Facebook. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3S2), 739-744.

van Dijk, T. (2013, August 15). Ideology and discourse. Retrieved June 17, 2021, from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093

van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffer & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 115-140). London: Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. (2010). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Leeuwen, T. (1991). Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum, 5(1), 76-114.

van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.

Wildfeuer, J. (2014). Film discourse interpretation towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. New York: Routledge.

Wildfeuer, J. (2017). It’s all about logics?! analyzing the rhetorical structure of multimodal filmic text. Semiotica, 2018(220), 95-121.

Wildfeuer,, J. (2019). Film text analysis: new perspectives on the analysis of filmic meaning. London: Routledge.

Winkler, C., & Pieslak, J. (2018). Multimodal Visual/sound redundancy in Isis Videos: A close analysis of martyrdom and training segments. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 13(3), 345-360.