Epic of Srush Stalingrad (Stalingrad Angel) written by the Tajik poet Mo'men Qanaat Semiotic reading

Document Type : Original Article

Author

The Department of Oriental Languages and Literature The Faculty of Arts, Ain Sahms University

Abstract

This study tackles the subject of a semiotic reading of the epic Srush Stalingrad (Stalingrad Angel) written by the Tajik poet Mo'men Qanaat. The events of this epic is about the battle of Stalingrad that occured between the Soviets and the Germans during the World War II and had an end with the victory of the Germans. The research is divided into preface, introduction and the main theme, which is divided into two chapters and finally a conclusion. The first chatpter deals with three topics; focus of the title and its appropriateness with the subject of the epic, then light text and if it fits with epic body, then the conclusion. The second chapter is divided into five axes in the epic; assault, resistance, life, death, light, darkness, victory, defeat, heroism and meanness and the chapter ends with defining the general sematic axis of the epic, axis of the angel and the devil. It is a comprehesive axis that many sub-axes fall into. The research ends with a conclusion and includes the most important results of the study.

Keywords

References

- The Holy Quran.
First: Arabic references:
1- Al-Jazzar, Mohamed Fikry: The Title and Semiotic of Literary Communication, (1998) Egyptian Book Authority.
2- Al-Dabbagh, Bilal Hussein Muhammad, (2017), poetry of ezz Al-Din Al-Manasrah (semiotic study), Islamic University of Gaza.
3- Al-Rashedi, Muhammad Thanun Yunis Fathi, The problem of increasing the building and its significance for increasing the meaning: an applied study on the letter s and will in the Holy Qur’an, vol. 8, p. 4, Research Journal of the College of Basic Education .
4- Badawi, Heba Muhammad Al-Saeed Hussein, (July 2015) Semiotics of Confusion and contrast in the epic (Khader Rah) by Muhammad Iqbal, No. 9, Part 2, Journal of the College of Languages ​​and Translation, Al-Azhar University.
5- Hammouda, Abdul Aziz, Convex Mirrors, From Structuralism to Deconstruction, Knowledge World Series P232, April 1998.
6- Khagani, Muhammad - Amer, Rida: The Semiotic method - The Mechanism of Approaching Modern Poetic Discourse and its Problems - Journal of Studies in Arabic Language and Literature , Issue 2 - 2111 AD.
7- Radwan, Laila Shaaban Sheikh Muhammad-Abbas, Siham Salama, The Semiotic method to Literary Text Analysis, Volume 1 of the 33rd issue of the Yearbook for the College of Islamic and Arab Studies for Girls in Alexandria.
8- Zahra, Sharshar Fatima, (2017/2018), the manifestations of the semiotic method in contemporary Arab
literary criticism (Ph.D.), Jilali Liabis University - Sidi Bel Abbas.
9- Selden, Raman, Contemporary Literary Theory, 1998, translate: Jaber Asfour, Qebaa Printing and Publishing House.
10- Allaq, Fateh, (2009), The Semiotic Analysis of Poetic Discourse in Contemporary Arab Criticism (Its Levels and Procedures), Maj. 25, G1 + 2, Damascus University Journal.
11- Ali, Hamdi Abdul-Radi, (2009AD
), the renewal of modern Iranian poetry and its effect on Persian poetry in Tajikistan (PhD).
12- Ghawwas, Zubaydah- The Symbol in Ezz El-Din Galaouji Theater (MA) - Al-khedr University, Algeria, 2011.
13- Khallab, Muhammad Mustafa Abdel-Rahman, (2017), semiotic phenomena in the poetry of the Palestinian prisoners, Vol. 25A2, Journal of the Islamic University for Humanitarian Research, Islamic University of Gaza.
14- Marrakeshi, Lamia, Surat Al-Baqara: A Semiotic Study, Sixth Year - No. 51 April 20, Jill Magazine for Literary and Intellectual Studies.
15- Moftah, Muhammad, (July 1992), Analysis of Poetic speech (Intertextuality Strategy), 3rd edition, The Arab Cultural Center.
مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب
Volume 21, Issue 5
Language and Literature
2020
Pages 319-366

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics