Delany’s Fugue: Troubling the Power of Surveillance over Dyeth's mind and Dyethshome in Stars in my Pocket Like Grains of Sand

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

قسم اللغة الانجليزية کلية الاداب جامعة عين شمس القاهرة مصر

المستخلص

Samuel Delany's Stars in my Pocket Like Grains of Sand (1984) challenges questionable conceptions of knowledge and their limits/limitations.  Theoretical study of this text has focused on considering issues of race and identity in relation to the science-fiction genre. This paper explores Delany’s text from a surveillance studies perspective to analyze how surveillance, as a technological tool of power, functions in it.  According to Foucault the disciplinary bent of society limits freedom. This is why tracing surveillance techniques in relation to knowledge as well as subjects/objects on Velm (an SF world in the novel) uncovers the limitations of seemingly liberal societies, who are disciplinary societies that put their power into practice through surveillance.

الكلمات الرئيسية

المراجع

 
Goulding, Anne. “Information: Commodity or Social Good?” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 33 (1) March 2001.            
Deacon, Roger Allen. Fabricating Foucault: Rationalizing the Management of      Individuals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 2003.        
Delany, Samuel R. Stars in My Pocket like Grains of Sand. Middleton: Wesleyan University Press. 1984.
     Foucault, Michel. Subjectivity and Truth: Lectures at the College de France       1980-1981. London: Palgrave and Macmillan Ed. 2017.             
           ------. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1977.                            
Hara, Noriko and Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo. “Analysis of roles in engaging contentious online discussions in science, “Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology volume 68, issue 8 1953-1966 (2017).
Heinlein, Robert A. ‘‘On the Writing of Speculative Fiction.” in Writing Science Fiction and Fantasy: 20 Dynamic Essays by the Field’s Top Professionals. St. Martin’s Griffin, 1993.
Lyon, David. “An Electronic Panopticon? A Sociological Critique of Surveillance   Theory”, The Sociological Review, 653-678.
----------. Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Polity Press: Oxford. 2007.
 ----------. Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. Routledge Press: London. 2003.
Merquior, Jose Guilherme. Foucault. California: University of California Press, 1987.
Racevskis, Karlis. “Edward Said and Michel Foucault: Affinities and Dissonances.” Research in African Literatures vol.36, no.3, Edward Said, Africa, and Cultural Criticism Autumn: Indiana University Press, 2005, 83-97. Rogers and Stevens. Classical Traditions in Science Fiction. London: Oxford, 2015.
Suvin, Darko.   Defined By A Hollow: Essays on Utopia, Science Fiction and Political Epistemology. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010.
Weiner, Jesse et al. Frankenstein and Its Classics: The Modern Prometheus from Antiquity to Science Fiction. New York: Bloomsbury, 2018.

ملفات

شارك

إرسال الاستشهاد إلى

الإحصائيات