Sociopragmatics in Cartoons: Politeness and Power Violations in the Arabic Version of Gumball

Osama, Seham

doi:10.21608/jssa.2023.173836.1449

Sociopragmatics in Cartoons: Politeness and Power Violations in the Arabic Version of Gumball

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

Seham Osama

قسم اللغة الإنجليزىة- كلية اللغات والترجمة- أكاديمية السادات للعلوم الإدارية

10.21608/jssa.2023.173836.1449

المستخلص

Sociopragmatic competence is essential for functioning effectively in a language. It is manifested in several aspects, such as politeness and power relationships (Harlow,1990). According to Brown and Levinson (1987), being polite is an effort on the part of the speaker to preserve his or her personal or the other person's face by attempting to minimize the effect of face-threatening acts (FATs). Power relations also play a pivotal role in augmenting or mitigating FATs in a particular context. The present study examines some marked elements of politeness and power relationships that the Arabic version of the popular American cartoon The Amazing World of Gumball carries. The qualitative analysis is applied to scenes that sample interactions within the family and school contexts. It examines if the used FTAs are marked in these contexts or not. These violations are introduced in a comic, attractive mode and are passed to children as favourable sociopragmatic practices. The analysis of the four selected scenes highlights several violations of politeness and power relations, such as ill-represented father-child marked interactions in the family context.

الكلمات الرئيسية

المراجع

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words.Oxford University Press

Badr, M. (2018). The Role of Children’s TV Channels in the Demolition of Moral Values: Cartoon Network Arabia Channel as a Model Analytical Study. Arab Journal of Sciences & Research Publishing, 4(3),102–83. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.M250618.

Bourdieu, P. (1992) Language and Symbolic Power (trans. G. Raymond and M. Adamson; ed. J. B. Thompson), Polity Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1981). The social context of language acquisition. Language & Communication, 1(2-3), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(81)90010-0

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control 1^st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436215

Fraser, B.& Nolen, W. (1981). The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 93–109.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction rituals: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Doubleday.

Gökçearslan , A. (2010). The Effect Of Cartoon Movies On Children's Gender Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.2 (2),5202-5207

Harlow, L. (1990). Do They Mean What They Say? Sociopragmatic Competence and Second Language Learners. The Modern Language Journal,74, 328–351.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307-0919.

Home, Gumball. (2018, December 5th). The Amazing World of Gumball. YouTube. Retrieved September 25th, 2022, from https://www.cartoonnetworkhq.com/show/gumball/character/darwin

House, J. (1989). Politeness in English and German: The Function of “Please” and “Bitte”. In S. Blum-Kulka, J House, & G. Kasper, (eds). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 96–119.

Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride, & A. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Irvine, J., Schieffelin, B., Series, C. M., Goodwin, M. H., Kuipers, J., Kulick, D., ... & Ochs, E. (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as An Interactive Phenomenon No. 11. Cambridge University Press.

Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 193–218.

Koike, D. (1998). Requests and the role of deixis in politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 13 (2), 187-202

Kramarae, C., Muriel S., & William M. O'Barr (1985.). Language and Power. Sage Publications.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language And Woman’s Place. Language In society, pp. 2, 45–80.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. Harper & Row.

Locher, M. & Watts, R. (2005). Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal Of Politeness Research. 1(1), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Mazid, B. M. (2008). The Politeness Principle from Grice to Netiquette. Annals of Arts and Social Sciences (AASS), 29, (281). Academic Publication Council. Kuwait University.

Mayr, A. (ed.) (2008) Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. London; New York: Continuum, 6 , 204.

Mayor, B. & Allington, D. (2012). Talking in English. In B. Mayor, and D. Allington (eds.). Communicating in English: Talk, Text, Technology. Routledge.

McLeod, S. (2011). Bandoura: Social Learning Theory. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html

McSweeney, B. (2002). The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, 55(11), 1363-1372.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, E. & Shohet M. (2006). The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization. In R. Larson, A. Wiley, & K. Branscomb, (eds). New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development 11: Family Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 35–50.

Ochs, E. & T Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2015). Discursive Underpinnings of Family Coordination. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds). The handbook of discourse analysis. 2^nd Edition.Blackwell Publishers.

Rai, S., Waskel, B., Sakalle, Salil., Dixit, S., & Mahore, R. (2016). Effects of cartoon programs on behavioural, habitual and communicative changes in children. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20161456.

Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press.

Settle, Q. (2018). Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. Journal of Applied Communications. 102 (3). doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1223.

Shuy, W. & Griffin, P. (1981). What do they do any day: studying functional language. In W. Patrick Dickson, (ed.) Children's Oral Communication Skills. Academic,271–86.

Song, S. (2012). Politeness and Culture In Second Language Acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.

Sudha, Dr. A. G. (2001). Factors Influencing the Change in the Behavior of Children on Viewing Cartoon Programs – A Study. Namex International Journal of Management Research,1.

Sultana, S. (2014). Role of Cartoon: A Brief Discussion on How Cartoons Impact Children. ENH Community Journal, 1.

Tawfik, H. (2005). Facework in Egyptian EFL Classroom Interactions. Journal of Faculty of Education (Literary section). XI, (11),3-42

Temple, C & Wright, A&J. (2015). Discourse in Educational Settings. In D. Schiffrin, Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2^nd Edition. Blackwell Publishers.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman.

Watts, R. (1989). Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness as Politic Behavior. Multilingua 8, 131–166.

Watts, R. (2019). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In R. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (Eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542-005

Yousuf, Z., Shehzad, M., & Hassan. A. (2015). Effects of Cartoon Network on the Behavior of School Going Children (A Case Study of Gujrat City). International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS), 1, 173-179.