Traversing Utopian Nature: A Proto-Ecological Approach to Thomas More’s Utopia

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

English Department Faculty of Arts Ain Shams University cairo Egypt

المستخلص

An understanding of the ecological philosophy of More’s Utopia ensues both a textual and contextual analysis. This fact/fiction interrelationship, inherent within utopian texts, makes any critical attempt to concentrate solely on their historical context or textual format flawed and reductive. More’s society was an agrarian, feudal, subsistence economy on the verge of transformation to a capitalist market economy. Land enclosures, referred to by More in the First Book of Utopia, represent a site for defining oppositional views regarding nature/human relationships. In early modern texts, pastoral and georgic concepts of nature were blurred in a perpetual process of interpenetration. It is this liminal position, which Utopia assumes as a fictional as well as a factual space that invites its interpretation as a chronotope.

My research is concerned with dealing with a canonical text like Utopia from an ecocritical perspective. Questions which concern me in this research revolve around: The relation between textual and contextual Nature in this text, Exploring the relationship between nature and humans from its earliest expressions and tracing within these early expressions the beginnings of contemporary ecological troubles.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية

المراجع

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: U P of Texas, 1981.
Egan, Gabriel. Green Shakespeare: From Ecopolitics to Ecocriticism. London: Routledge, 2006.
Haines, Valerie A. “From Organicist to Relational Human Ecology.” Sociological Theory, Vol. 3, No.1 (Spring, 1985) 65-74.
Holquist, Michael. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. London: Routledge, 1990.
Hunt, John Dixon. “‘Gard’ning can Speak Proper English’.”In Culture and Cultivation in Early Modern England: Writing and the Land. Eds. Michael Leslie and Timothy Raylor. Leicester: Leicester UP, 1992.
Kamps Ivo and Melissa L. Smith. ‘Utopian Ecocriticism : Naturalizing Nature in Thomas More’s Utopia.’In Early Modern Ecostudies : From the Florentine Codex to Shakespeare.Eds. Thomas Hallock, Ivo Kamps and Karen L. Raber. New York : Palgrave and Macmillan, 2008.
Leslie, Michael. “Introduction.” Culture and Cultivation in Early Modern England: Writing and the Land. Eds. Michael Leslie and Timothy Raylor. Leicester: Leicester U P, 1992.
McCutcheon, Elizabeth. “(Eco)Utopian Fictions in Early Modern England.” Critical Approaches to English Prose Fiction 1520-1640. Ed. Donald Beecher. Ottawa: Dovehouse Editions, 1998.
Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1980.
Miles, Gary B. Virgil’s Georgics: A New Interpretation. Berkeley: U of California Press, 1980.
More, Thomas. “Utopia.” Thomas More Utopia, Francis Bacon New Atlantis, Henry Neville The Isle of Pines. Ed. Susan Bruce. Oxford: Oxford U P, 1999.
Morson, Gary S. The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky’s Diary of a Writer and the Traditions of Literary Utopia. Austin: U of Texas Press, 1981.
Siemon, James R. “Landlord Not King: Agrarian Change and Interarticulation” In Enclosure Acts: Sexuality, Property, and Culture in Early Modern England.Eds. Richard Burt and James Archer. Cornell: Cornell UP, 2019.
Williams, Raymond. The Country and The City. London: Chatto and Windus, 1973.

ملفات

شارك

إرسال الاستشهاد إلى

الإحصائيات